I was lucky enough to recieve an advance copy of 'David Farrant: Out Of the Shadows' earlier this week. While I obviously can't reveal too much, I think it's safe to say there's going to be one very red faced fake bish in bournmouth very soon. At least I think his face will be red. It could be difficult to tell under all that egg! :-))
Still, Seans well known for his sense of humour and I'm sure he'll take these revelations of his past with his usual good grace and easy going manner.......
which means he's gonna hit the roof! Ho ho!
On a different note I've recieved a few more e-mails regarding his fake user names. I'll put them up in a few days. Thanks to everybody who sent them in. I honestly don't know how he keeps track of them all. I guess it's just lucky he's got no religious duties to fulfil, at least he's got plenty of time on his hands.
I've set up this blog to refute the one sided postings of our loopy friend in Bournmouth. As we all know he writes lies and nastiness about people from behind the shelter of various assumed usernames. When people complain he does'nt post their comments or edits them to look favourable. Here's the place if you want to reply!!
Tuesday, 19 July 2011
Sunday, 17 July 2011
A Cut Above
Last Friday our potty pal seems to have spent most of his birthday writing a blog of epic proportions, most of which was devoted to accusing David Farrant of libel and deriding him and some of his friends. In amongst this highly amusing piece of pseudo morally outraged nastiness the bish cut and pasted this passage from Davids blog;
"Well, today is not my birthday but I certainly enjoyed opening Kev’s present! The package contained essential research material dating back many years, including b/w and colour photographs, written correspondence and a selection of personal emails which had been copied onto disc for me. There was also a typed summary of some fairly recent ‘birthday speeches’, or more precisely, suggestions from the host on what should be ‘done about David Farrant’. He (the party host) hadn’t liked my disclosures about fake religious groups and other written material in my published books that debunked a serious belief in vampirism. ... I believe Kev will be returning to Spain later in August, but he will be coming over with Bev before that as they would like to meet a couple of other people."
Unfortunately Sean's accidently edited out a few minor points in the above, such as the part about his room full of nazi paraphanalia, the bit where he uses fake user names to malign people on a far right website and the part where he gave out Davids private adress with the advice "he lives alone"
Luckily enough I spotted Seans mistake and was fortunately able to correct it for him. We would'nt want him looking like a fraud and a liar now, would we!
"Well, today is not my birthday but I certainly enjoyed opening Kev’s present! The package contained essential research material dating back many years, including b/w and colour photographs, written correspondence and a selection of personal emails which had been copied onto disc for me. There was also a typed summary of some fairly recent ‘birthday speeches’, or more precisely, suggestions from the host on what should be ‘done about David Farrant’. He (the party host) hadn’t liked my disclosures about fake religious groups and other written material in my published books that debunked a serious belief in vampirism. ... I believe Kev will be returning to Spain later in August, but he will be coming over with Bev before that as they would like to meet a couple of other people."
Unfortunately Sean's accidently edited out a few minor points in the above, such as the part about his room full of nazi paraphanalia, the bit where he uses fake user names to malign people on a far right website and the part where he gave out Davids private adress with the advice "he lives alone"
Luckily enough I spotted Seans mistake and was fortunately able to correct it for him. We would'nt want him looking like a fraud and a liar now, would we!
Friday, 15 July 2011
Bonky the birthday boy
I'd just like to take this opportunity to wish our favorite fake bish a very happy 67th birthday. Here's to many more years of insane drivel and character assassination! Hip hip hurrah!
Tuesday, 5 July 2011
This extract is taken from 'The Last Post' (by Sean of course, this time posing as FoSBM)
"Mr Farrant's eldest son (born in November 1967) also indulges in vulgar language and not-so-veiled threats. Jamie Coster, now calling himself Jamie Farrant, stayed out of the picture for over four decades before deciding to seek out his deviant father to the chagrin of the rest of his family.
Veritas commented:
"After forty years of managing to avoid Farrant's curse, Jamie Farrant (chatty.gef) has finally had the sins of the father visited upon him. Now approaching forty-four, he seems every bit as reprehensible as the man whose poisonous legacy he continues by colluding in a vendetta almost as old as himself. Jamie Farrant suddenly sought out his father and decided to change the surname, which had served him for the best part of four decades, from 'Coster' to 'Farrant.'"
Oh dear, It seems I've instigated yet another hissy fit from the raving 'Rev'. Well what can I say.
The fact is that criticism from this pompous idiot can only be a good thing. When you consider his constant lying, his far right wing beliefs (yes,I DO have the photo Sean), his attacks on innocent people he's never even met and his general nasty attitude to all that dare to disagree with him then I take his dissaproval as a compliment. Thanks mate, keep it coming, it's good to know I'm doing something right :-))
On a serious note there is one thing I'd like to clarify.Sean writes,
"Jamie Farrant, stayed out of the picture for over four decades before deciding to seek out his deviant father to the chagrin of the rest of his family."
Seeing as Sean has never met, talked to or been in contact with any member of my family (excluding David of course) for over 40 years, I'm wondering why he feels qualified to discuss their reactions, as he obviously knows absolutely nothing about them.
Just more lies I'm afraid,
Will he ever stop? Somehow I very much doubt it, writing fiction is his forte after all!
"Mr Farrant's eldest son (born in November 1967) also indulges in vulgar language and not-so-veiled threats. Jamie Coster, now calling himself Jamie Farrant, stayed out of the picture for over four decades before deciding to seek out his deviant father to the chagrin of the rest of his family.
Veritas commented:
"After forty years of managing to avoid Farrant's curse, Jamie Farrant (chatty.gef) has finally had the sins of the father visited upon him. Now approaching forty-four, he seems every bit as reprehensible as the man whose poisonous legacy he continues by colluding in a vendetta almost as old as himself. Jamie Farrant suddenly sought out his father and decided to change the surname, which had served him for the best part of four decades, from 'Coster' to 'Farrant.'"
Oh dear, It seems I've instigated yet another hissy fit from the raving 'Rev'. Well what can I say.
The fact is that criticism from this pompous idiot can only be a good thing. When you consider his constant lying, his far right wing beliefs (yes,I DO have the photo Sean), his attacks on innocent people he's never even met and his general nasty attitude to all that dare to disagree with him then I take his dissaproval as a compliment. Thanks mate, keep it coming, it's good to know I'm doing something right :-))
On a serious note there is one thing I'd like to clarify.Sean writes,
"Jamie Farrant, stayed out of the picture for over four decades before deciding to seek out his deviant father to the chagrin of the rest of his family."
Seeing as Sean has never met, talked to or been in contact with any member of my family (excluding David of course) for over 40 years, I'm wondering why he feels qualified to discuss their reactions, as he obviously knows absolutely nothing about them.
Just more lies I'm afraid,
Will he ever stop? Somehow I very much doubt it, writing fiction is his forte after all!
Wednesday, 29 June 2011
Good for the goose
I was reading the barking bishes blog earlier when I came across this highly amusing piece of hypocrisy!
"It is illegal to impersonate a person of the clergy unless it is transparently obvious that it is intended as a fancy dress costume at a fancy dress party, or something of that kind, and the intention, wittingly or unwittingly, is not to deceive anyone into believing the fake cleric is actually an ordained clergyman in holy orders. Someone who has impersonated another person for many years, for example, might be clinically diagnosed as having a mental disorder for compulsive impostorising. Impostor syndrome, sometimes called impostor phenomenon or fraud syndrome, however, is a psychological phenomenon in which people are unable to internalise their accomplishments, and should not be confused with the kind of malicious impersonation being described here which is often accompanied by acts that are to the detriment of the impersonated. In many countries it is a crime to impersonate somebody on the internet, and it is certainly illegal to dress up as a priest if the person doing so could be confused with a real clergyman."
Aside from the fact he seems to have taken seriously what is obviously a blatant piece of mickey taking, he's also conveniently forgotten that his own claims of episcopalness are highly suspect to say the least. Even if, as he says, he was consecrated a bishop, he was then excommunicated. He can't have one without the other. If the consecration was valid it naturally follows that the excommunication was valid too. Particularly as both rites were performed by the same man. Either way, his claims of being a prelate are as fake as his usernames.
He has no church, no diocese and no congregation. When I asked him what services he performed he avoided the question with his old ploy of crying abuse.
I think maybe its time to hang up the silly hat and stop wearing purple, although it'll probably match his complexion when he reads this. :-)))
"It is illegal to impersonate a person of the clergy unless it is transparently obvious that it is intended as a fancy dress costume at a fancy dress party, or something of that kind, and the intention, wittingly or unwittingly, is not to deceive anyone into believing the fake cleric is actually an ordained clergyman in holy orders. Someone who has impersonated another person for many years, for example, might be clinically diagnosed as having a mental disorder for compulsive impostorising. Impostor syndrome, sometimes called impostor phenomenon or fraud syndrome, however, is a psychological phenomenon in which people are unable to internalise their accomplishments, and should not be confused with the kind of malicious impersonation being described here which is often accompanied by acts that are to the detriment of the impersonated. In many countries it is a crime to impersonate somebody on the internet, and it is certainly illegal to dress up as a priest if the person doing so could be confused with a real clergyman."
Aside from the fact he seems to have taken seriously what is obviously a blatant piece of mickey taking, he's also conveniently forgotten that his own claims of episcopalness are highly suspect to say the least. Even if, as he says, he was consecrated a bishop, he was then excommunicated. He can't have one without the other. If the consecration was valid it naturally follows that the excommunication was valid too. Particularly as both rites were performed by the same man. Either way, his claims of being a prelate are as fake as his usernames.
He has no church, no diocese and no congregation. When I asked him what services he performed he avoided the question with his old ploy of crying abuse.
I think maybe its time to hang up the silly hat and stop wearing purple, although it'll probably match his complexion when he reads this. :-)))
Sunday, 26 June 2011
The More the Merrier
A couple of weeks ago I asked if anybody knew of any sock puppet usernames coined by our potty prelate friend and the response has been frankly astonishing. Here's a few to start.......
Mythbuster
Arminius Vambery
James
Katrina Garforth-Bles
Dennis Crawford
Michael Thane
Demonologist
Vampirologist
Vampire Researcher
Vampire Research Society
Exorcistate
So late into the night
Robin Crisp
Peter Lord
George Byron
‘Caledfwych’ (the name of King Arthur’s sword!)
Society of St. George
Apostle of Christ
Veritas
I think a trip to Bishops Are Us is due. A bigger silly hat's definately needed with all those nutters sharing it. Stay tuned for more!!
Thanks for all the suggestions and keep them coming.
Mythbuster
Arminius Vambery
James
Katrina Garforth-Bles
Dennis Crawford
Michael Thane
Demonologist
Vampirologist
Vampire Researcher
Vampire Research Society
Exorcistate
So late into the night
Robin Crisp
Peter Lord
George Byron
‘Caledfwych’ (the name of King Arthur’s sword!)
Society of St. George
Apostle of Christ
Veritas
I think a trip to Bishops Are Us is due. A bigger silly hat's definately needed with all those nutters sharing it. Stay tuned for more!!
Thanks for all the suggestions and keep them coming.
Monday, 20 June 2011
Show me the money
A word of warning to any authors or purveyors of merchandise. It seems our nutty friend ordered himself a copy of Patsy Langleys 'The Highgate Vampire Casebook' and promised to send a cheque to pay for it. Well guess what, no cheque ever arrived. Could it be the three cars and the Bournmouth bungalow have left him strapped for cash, after all not too long ago he was complaining he couldn't afford his favourite libel suits.
I suggest he hand the collection plate round although with only him to contribute it might take a while.
Seriously though Sean, thievings not a very christian to do now is it. If you must steal, why not take some lead off the outhouse church roof, it's not like anyone ever goes in there!
Will/can he pay?........ watch this space!
I suggest he hand the collection plate round although with only him to contribute it might take a while.
Seriously though Sean, thievings not a very christian to do now is it. If you must steal, why not take some lead off the outhouse church roof, it's not like anyone ever goes in there!
Will/can he pay?........ watch this space!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)